Product benchmark
What a supervisory autopilot is worth on your plant
A matched A/B on the Cerro Corona (autobench) flowsheet — the circuit on its existing PID, then under the Signalise autopilot, same ore and seed. Measured over 6,120 steps (~102 h of plant time).
How the value shows up
Read top to bottom. Incoming ore hardness (the disturbance) drives the mill. PID holds the SAG-speed setpoint at a static nominal; Signalise rides it up as hard ore loads the mill — capturing throughput and recovery the fixed setpoint leaves on the table, without tipping the mill into overload.
PID vs. Signalise, stat by stat
Settled-state averages over the second half of the matched run, so the comparison is like-for-like. Bars grow from parity toward the better arm; the plant runs smoother, not just harder — recovery and throughput up, energy and overload down.
lower is better
time above trip load
How it's measured
A matched A/B, not a demo
Both arms run the same simulated ore body (a four-mode hardness distribution) from an identical seed and warm-up. The PID arm is the regulatory baseline; the Signalise arm adds the supervisory autopilot on top of that same PID, so the A/B isolates the autopilot's effect. Percentages are computed from settled-state means — no cherry-picked window.
This report is a single representative seed. The same pipeline runs on your plant from historian data: it establishes your PID baseline, quantifies the achievable uplift, and reports it alongside the world model's accuracy — before a single setpoint is dispatched. Headline economics are computed per plant from your grades, prices, and operating hours.